Monday, December 26, 2011

kwanzaa 2011

I'm not proud of the ranting I do online. It's sometimes done in a fit of jealousy, or a crushing wave of insecurity. In moments when I forget the beauty of the present and the future. But this is me: I'm not some cultivated online persona with nothing but funny, deranged things to say. I believe in discretion and sensitivity, but I'm skeptical about self-censorship. There's always truth in something that is uttered; it's just a matter of whether the truth resides in the statement itself, or the subtext, or both. 

Also, isn't it kinda weird that I'm talking to an imagined audience online? Hey imagined audience, does anyone here read this in my voice? I don't even know how my voice sounds like to other people! Crazy huh! 

Sunday, December 25, 2011

angry shoes

Re: college and my future — am feeling jittery about meeting all the deadlines by next year. And my scholarship basket is empty as frak. (Hey there, WASP who marked my KI scripts: fuck you. Also to a certain statutory board: I hope you get audited, and I hope you flunk it. To the kids playing with whistles outside: here's a fun fact! If you place the whistle deeper down your throat, you'll be able to whistle WITHOUT needing any special equipment! Here try it —)

BTW merry christmas everyone and watch your cholesterol levels. Peace and love.

Grinchy.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

in the eyes of

I have a theory that the past is at first a horrifying memory which makes a progression towards beauty, thought and saudade. The initial horror stems from a sense of abjection: the person in the memory is simultaneously me and also not me. What energizes the progression towards thought and beauty really are the dual motions of time and experience. We feel saudade because we are utterly cognizant, utterly powerless, about the expanding intangible distances between self and memory, and it is only this way that Man is truly vulnerable.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

yeasty goodness

Since spambots are the only people* who read this blog, I feel like I can write things** in here with relatively inconsequential implications.

The problem with me is that I value verbosity as a sign of consciousness to the point of adopting this as a personal virtue to be upheld and cherished. This is perhaps why my family has stopped reading my blog — I am boring and incapable of being the subject of scandal. In real life, I have learnt that most of my Asian peers have a hearing range shaped by the intricate and delicate frequencies of music they listen to, such as the sparkly glitter music of Girls Generation, Avril Lavigne's artful and well-deliberated screeching, and the sexy, shrill whining of the Simple Plan boys. As a result of such cultivated listening tastes, they cannot hear me clearly, for puberty had gifted me with a low and obscure voice reviewed by some as the "gentle baritone of a dying cat's last breath", "a rhinoceros' silent fart" and "the sound raindrops make as they roll down sandpaper." If you have already heard about the very real social problem of Not Knowing What's The Maximum Number Of Times You Can Ask "What?" When Trying To Understand A Person, maybe it's time you heard the other side of the story — the one that ends with "and thus, the mute reached for the nearest chair and pummeled his friend bloody."

People with low voices are so often rejected by society. Society makes fun of their low voices, because apparently it's the funniest thing in their (tiny lil') world! Some employers have a minimum Hz allowance. Go below that and it's the blue-collared world for you, young'un, but of course it doesn't make you less of a person because every single worker has his own small and perfect role in society! When was the last time you heard a man's manly voice on the train's PA system? For me, this was approximately 18 months ago on the NY subway, but because I miss those times so much, it feels like 18 centuries ago. THAT'S RIGHT, IT HAS BEEN 18 CENTURIES SINCE I HEARD A MAN'S MANLY VOICE OVER THE TRAIN'S PA SYSTEM.  

This is why I have turned to written and visual forms of language and communication, packed in densely strung paragraphs, to express my personality and ultimately my being because that's how real conversation looks like. What is communicated in a a certain gesture, be it giveaway eyebrow twitching and a nervous wring of an arm-sleeve, takes the form of sentence structures so subtle in their intent that they pretend to hide what they really intend to reveal, and pretend to reveal what they really intend to hide. Take more time to process my sentences, why don't you. Sentence are awesome and I can do whatever I want with them, PSLE English be damned. 

* I like to adopt a very loose definition of "people"
** the vulnerable nakedness of my most primal insecurities

Thursday, December 15, 2011

bread and earth

Here I am, at my workplace at 11.30 at night, feeling strange and displaced. My head is made of lead and my arms are suspended from my body by fibres of light and spun cheetos. My energy right now is that much provisional. 

Anyway I'm back from Vietnam and I am wondering if it sounds a tad condescending to say that I am moderately enamored by this charming land. My head's still spinning from shuttling frenetically between the chaotic urban sprawl that is Hanoi and the countryside with the new Panasonic factories lifting away its fogged slumber. On the road, hills and mountains greet me from the horizon, then dart back behind the wall of buildings. I am not a stranger to having motorcycles and scooters swerve about inches away from you, like dragonflies negotiating the still damp air, but the experience of these streets is constantly overwhelming. I'm not sure whether it overwhelms me in a good or bad way, but the flow of traffic strikes me as a daily celebration of human instinct and flexibility. I feel more, if you will, human on these streets because I'm constantly making eye contact with the motorists, graciously giving and taking the spaces on the roads, using instinct to negotiate my way to the other end. Walking across the street is an indispensable urban language here. It's a refreshing change from glancing at the disembodied faces behind the darkened windshields, parked neatly behind the lines, impatient for your crossing (whereby you are never fast enough) and the traffic light's changing (no matter how inevitable it is.)

"The traffic lights here are merely a suggestion," says S, our Singaporean guide who is now based in Hanoi, as she walks breezily across a busy traffic circus. Another thing about the streets - you can't be taken seriously if you get cold feet mid-stride. Everyone is sure to identify you as a first-timer, a greenhorn to the dissonance of such casual deregulation in a communist state. Taken further, to feel apprehension in the middle of the road is to doubt the delicate ecosystem of confidence between its users. It takes a great deal of trust to know that the Vespa won't plow right through you despite being 8 metres in front and traveling at least 50 km/h.

The urban-rural divide is a false dichotomy here. Sidewalks seem to spew greenery from either side of the roads, with vines getting tangled in some rusty second-floor balustrades, creeping up the power cables, plaiting them clumsily together as if friendship bracelets frayed by time. In the countryside, industry emerges from the fertile ground in grey blocks of economic promise. Oxen walk along the highways, from the market, oblivious to the thunder-like rumble of container trucks. 

Of course, I am looking at the different landscapes through voyeuristic, touristy lenses. It's hard not to romanticize experiences of traveling in a land so foreign to your own, because we are so distanced from the reality of uncertainty and discomfort within these memories, but it's a long night and some nights are not worth sleeping.

Sunday, December 04, 2011

vignettes




"thoughts" and "concerns"

I'm flying to Hanoi tomorrow. This is exciting and emancipating. It feels like life is normal again and I'm no longer the reluctant subject of the state apparatus etc. etc.

Anyway I'm currently reading this Nicholas Tarling book on Nationalism in SEA and it's bringing me back to the stuffy theatrette and the badly designed foldable tables. There are fond memories and there are less-fond memories, and in this bizarre mental flurry of time and reminiscing, I realise with much horror that my SATs are in two months' time and I haven't done a full paper yet. Therefore I suck at being Asian.  I will obviously fail the writing section because the examiners are going to resurrect David Foster Wallace and he will dissect every sentence I write and mock its terrible non-native speaker grammar, and then I'll feel wronged, insecure and disillusioned once more. This will be the emotional fuel for my memoir, a slim volume of recollections that will be published posthumously, in the year 2300, in a Chinese archeology monograph about folk writing among the urban underclass. 

Additionally, this insecurity is compounded by the recent questioning of the utility of my weird academic interests. Cultural anthropology? Comparative literature? Historiography? I'm surrounded by healthcare professionals dedicated to the lives of other human beings, so knowledge concerning the plurality of definitions in the study of nationalism, or describing the unity of form, content and tone in a sonnet, seems to be much of a trivial and selfish preoccupation. The narcissism of language games, the destructive acts of framing and re-framing real human problems into abstract and abstruse theory, the active complicity between language, knowledge and sources of oppression... I realize that everything I love is also everything that I condemn. 

I don't know how I'm going to reconcile these dissonant polarities. How do people in ivory towers connect with "those on the ground"? I think the very phrase "those on the ground" necessarily frames and re-enforces a vertical relationship that will continue to stay vertical unless a deeply horizontal relationship is established and sustained. Can one really take an interest in the "expressions of humanity" without firstly taking an interest in what's primal and fundamental in sustaining these "expressions"? Does anyone feel this way too?

Thursday, December 01, 2011

sentences all around me

"With the rise of ethnography — as described by Stocking, and also as demonstrated in linguistics, racial theory, historical classification — there is a codification of difference, and various evolutionary schemes going from primitive to subject race, and finally to superior or civilized peoples."

"Sweetheart, you still have scads of time for things like that. Your whole life is ahead of you."

"Thou thimble,/ Thou yard, three-quarters, half-yard, quarter, nail!"

"For this recipe we're adding grated apple to exxy strawberries, making the jam stretch further."

"At the start of the play, Richard has just had his brother Clarence arrested and placed in the Tower of London."

"He frowned and looked sideways at the phone, as if the phone itself had betrayed him."

"To what extent should the State involve itself in the world of business?"