Oh well, my TV's still the prehistoric CRT kind. So many interfering lines! I was amazed by Tan Kheng Hua's eloquance when she gave her critique of the crossfire round but perhaps due to the blatant firing of examples to take the place of logic, the adjudication was neither promising nor was there even a hint of credit. But in the end I think she was the judge who managed to understand where the debate was going, instead of being flowery and enigmatic to exude some aura or lack thereof in her speech.
I expect the Xinmin vs. Loyang round to be... interesting. In the end, style mostly covers for lacklustre content, which may be annoying, depending on whose side you're on.
No comments:
Post a Comment